Alle Artikel
DockerKubernetes

Docker Swarm vs. Kubernetes: Was passt zu Ihrem VPS?

Veröffentlicht am 12. März 2024 · 10 Min. Lesezeit

Dieser Artikel ist auf Französisch und Englisch verfügbar.

The match everyone asks about

Docker Swarm is dead, they've said since 2019. Yet every week we see customers happily deploying Swarm clusters — and single-node Kubernetes clusters consuming 2 GB of RAM to run three containers. The real question isn't fashion, it's fit to scale.

Swarm: orchestration without the tax

docker swarm init and you have an orchestrator: replicated services, rolling updates, secrets, overlay network. The learning curve is measured in hours, not weeks. On one to five VPS, Swarm does everything 95% of teams need with zero additional components.

Kubernetes: powerful, but demanding

K8s shines beyond 5-10 nodes with dedicated teams. Below that, you pay the complexity (etcd, control plane, manifests) without reaping the benefits. k3s softens the bill — 512 MB of RAM — but it's still Kubernetes to administer.

Our decision table

1 VPS, a few services: Compose. 2-5 VPS, rolling deploys: Swarm. 5+ nodes, platform team, fine autoscaling needs: k3s/K8s. Whatever the orchestrator, node performance remains the foundation: NVMe Gen4 for images and volumes, fast inter-site networking (10 Gbps internal with us) for the overlay.

The frequent hybrid case

Many of our customers pair: a production VPS on Swarm, plus a small VPS dedicated to tooling (registry, monitoring, backups) — simplicity without the single point of fragility.